armata tank vs abrams

This is said to be effective against all threat types, whereas Drozd could only defeat ATGMs and HEAT projectiles within a certain velocity range. The T-14 Armata can be accurately described as the first true “Russian” tank to land a contract for production, as it is the first tank design to do so that came after the fall of the Soviet Union. Despite its superior APS, the thin armor on the Armata’s turret could be its undoing. In fact, the Armata comes in many versions as was envisioned for the U.S. Army’s now-defunct Future Combat System program. He also gives the Soviet estimates for the M1A1, 600 mm vs APFSDS, and 700 mm vs HEAT. Soviet tanks placed less emphasis on matching Western tanks one for one and more on overwhelming the adversary using sheer numbers—crew survivability was a secondary concern. With the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, the spectre of a massive armored Red Army juggernaut smashing its way through the Fulda Gap is long past, but Russia has continued to develop new tanks and armored vehicles. In the end, the M1A2 SEP v3 is an incremental improvement and would likely fight the same way previous M1s have, just better. The Armata’s current round, the 9M119 Reflecks, has a range of 3.1 miles (roughly comparable to the current Abrams) and can penetrate up to 900 millimeters of armor, … Many of these changes relate to logistics and battlefield networking, improving tank readiness and battlefield awareness. Does M1 Abrams, specifically new M1A2 SEP V3 (aka M1A2C) , stand a chance against most modern Russian tank, the T-14 Armata? Instead of a relatively simple design, the T-14 is fitted with a number of very advanced features that have never been implemented in an operational tank anywhere else in the world. Moreover, for the first time, the Russian military seems to have placed a premium on crew survivability. In addition, the tank fields the Afghanit APS, which includes hard-kill components. What immediately sets the Armata apart from any other operational tank is that it has an unmanned turret. Armata vs Abrams Which one is better? Ultimately, it could prove to be a formidable weapon. While this was disrupted by the breakup of the Soviet Union and the resulting cuts in defense budgets on both sides, the next generation of tanks are finally reaching maturity. The Malachit ERA, which is present on the hull and on the top of the turret is said to be more effective than earlier generations. If a modern M829A4 round got through the APS of the Armata and struck the turret, it would likely knock out the gun mechanism and take the Armata out of the fight, although the crew would probably survive. Further, there is the question of whether the T-14 can be produced in numbers—that’s very much a factor, given the state of Russia’s economy. By comparison, M1A2 Abrams weighs 62 tons and has a top speed of only about 40 mph. New guided projectiles might also enable the Abrams to hit targets as far away as 12,000m. The most prominent of these is the T-14 main battle tank Armata variant. ). There are only a handful of Armatas and these won’t be enough to number one full battalion. Thus, the Armata is probably significantly more survivable than the M1A2 SEP v3 and could potentially defeat American rounds before they even hit the armor. Whether it’s actually possible for an APS to intercept the hypersonic APFSDS rounds has yet to be seen. The forthcoming M1A3 will be somewhat lighter and more mobile. Defensively, the Armata’s Afghanit APS is likely superior to the M1A2 SEP v3’s Trophy APS, due to the integrated nature of the system. Also the Armata has a new Malakhit add-on explosive reactive armor that is claimed to be of new generation. Armata vs leopard Panzer Leopard -75% - Panzer Leopard im Angebot . The primary difference in the new cannon is the increased operating pressure to allow for a higher muzzle velocity, although these exact parameters are unknown. Kto z koho? by Dave Majumda Nonetheless, while not discussed much by US tank developers, Abrams modernization efforts are without question being designed to meet and exceed any dangers posed by rival nation tanks… The M1A2 SEP v3 also incorporates improvements in key areas. The tank was first displayed in public during rehearsals for the 2015 Moscow Victory Day Parade. The Abrams is a proven, reliable design that is still being upgraded. The Armata is a new design, and it will inevitably have teething problems as it matures. The Afghanit active protection system allegedly includes millimeter-wave radars to detect, track and intercept incoming rounds. In terms of conventional armor, the Armata is still believed to be a slightly less well protected than an M1A2 Abrams or Leopard 2 judging by its weight of around fifty to sixty tons. In 2017, it was also announced that the M1A2 SEP v3 package would include the Trophy Hard-Kill APS, improving its protection. Also the Abrmas tanks are fitted with countermeasures system, which interrupts infra red and laser guidance of anti-tank missiles. Representing Russia and based on a set of almost all-new technology and design is the T-14 Armata. The other improvements of the Armata are fairly standard. The U.S. Army also plans to replace the 120mm M256 smoothbore gun with a lighter version. What’s more, Russia plans to give autonomous capabilities to Armata T-14, allowing the tank to fight by itself with little assistance from the crew. That might mean even a glancing blow to the turret results in a mission kill where the tank is drivable, but unable to shoot back. The 2A82 gun also lacks a bore evacuator, a device that reduces the burnt propellant gases entering the breech compartment after firing, as it is unnecessary for an unmanned turret. Heute bestellen, versandkostenfrei ; Today, I'm happy to experiment the duel between Leopard 2A7+ vs T-14 Armata. Main armament: 2A46M 125 mm smoothbore gun with 43 rounds (T-90) 125 mm (4.92 in) smoothbore 2A82-1M tank cannon: Engine: 950 hp (736 kW) for V-92S2 12-cyl. Aktuelle Preise für Produkte vergleichen! While maximizing crew survivability is always a priority in tank design, the Armata takes it to the next level by placing the entire crew in an armored capsule in the tank’s hull. Politics ... Upgraded Abrams tank vs. Russia's T-14 Armata. Afghanit is also probably better ergonomically integrated with the crew’s displays and controls due to it being a part of the design from the start. Chemical energy tank rounds (commonly known as HEAT rounds) travel more slowly and are easier to intercept than APFSDS rounds. Russia’s Armata family of armored combat vehicles is a departure from the previous Soviet practice of developing relatively simple, inexpensive but specialized platforms. Why does it need one? © Copyright 2020 Center for the National Interest All Rights Reserved, Tank Showdown: America's M1 Abrams Vs. Russia's Armata (Who Wins? [citation needed] During the 2015 rehearsals, one of the tanks suddenly stopped moving, and after attempts to tow it failed, it moved away under its own power after about 15 minutes.At least seven T-14 Armata tanks appeared in the 2015 and 2016 Moscow Victory Day parade, five in 2017 and 2018. Die russische Armee zählte zu Beginn dieses Jahres rund 2.700 Panzer. Main armament: 125 mm (4.92 in) smoothbore 2A82-1M tank cannon: 120 mm rifled gun: Engine: diesel 1,500 hp: MTU 838 Ka 501 1400 hp: Speed: 80–90 km/h: 72 km/h (45 mph) T-14 Armata and M1 Abrams. In prior Russian tanks, the ammunition was stored in the same area as the crew, surrounding them. All thermal imaging matrices in the United States are produced indigenously and have been for generations. Soviet tanks were relatively simple, extremely rugged and produced in mass quantities. This is the second time a APS with hard-kill has seen contract adoption on a Russian tank, with only the Drozd system being deployed before on the T-55. The sights and APS are generally accepted to be outside of this armor, meaning that they could be damaged through the cover from shots from a side aspect of the tank. Army and industry weapons developers have begun work on an advanced next-generation Abrams tank. The T-14 is a complete departure from previous Soviet and Russian tanks, all of which take their design cues from the lessons the Red Army learned fighting the Wehrmacht during the Second World War. Russian tanks used to rely on high-tech foreign components in some subsystems. Name: T-14 Armata M1 Abrams; Type: Main battle tank: Main battle tank: Origin: Russia: USA: Produced: 2015: 1980: Unit cost: 3.7 million $ 8.58 million $ (2012) More: Description, operators: Description, operators: Specifications. Meanwhile, the United States has continued to rely on upgraded versions of the Cold War–era M1 Abrams and Bradley fighting vehicle. Das Pentagon verfügt über rund 9.000 Abrams-Panzer, die größtenteils veraltet sind. The Armata’s current round, the 9M119 Reflecks, has a range of 3.1 miles (roughly comparable to the current Abrams) and can penetrate up to 900 millimeters of armor, … Unlike the T-14, it doesn’t radically change the way the vehicle can fight. Unlike some Russian tanks that have dual gunners’ sighting systems, such as the T-72B3, the Armata only has one gunner sight on the turret that is fed remotely to the gunner’s station in the fighting compartment. The unmanned turret provides the Armata with its main advantage: enhanced crew survivability. Tags: Russia Armata Tank United States Abrams Russia's Armata T-14 Tank vs. America's M-1 Abrams: Who Wins? Which is the best? Tank Showdown: America's M1 Abrams vs. Russia's Armata (Who Wins?) National Interest defense analyst Dave Majumdar says it’s quite difficult to say which tank is better. There also is an improved armor package, but details are unknown. t-14 armata vs abrams t-14 armata wiki t-14 vs m1a2 t-145 t-14 vs m1a1 t-1400-psu-ac t-14 wiki t-14 armata armor t-14 armata tank t-14 armata analysis t-14 armata specs t-14 armata janes t14 armor t-14 armata india a t-14 tank t+a 140 t14 law school t.a.t. Noch 17.500 Maschinen sind in Reserve. In a fight against each other, the M1A2 SEP v3 would likely have an advantage in detection. Further, there is … The turbine engine of the Abrams is also likely quieter than the diesel of the T-14 Armata, but the Armata is lighter and has a better horsepower to ton ratio, giving it better mobility. The earlier mockups suggest such a shot could be taken from a rather wide arc, as opposed to on other Western tanks where the sight is more smoothly integrated into the hull. But Russian tanks are also equipped to fire anti-tank guided missiles via their main gun—it’s really a question of who sees the other first. September 11, 2015 Topic: Security Blog Brand: The Buzz. The gunner’s sight being outside of the main armor on the Armata makes it a larger target than the gunner’s sight on the M1A2 SEP v3. A U.S. M1A2 SEP Abrams battle tank fires live rounds during a joint military exercise between South Korea and the U.S. northeast of Seoul on September 1, 2011. Further, the tank is equipped with passive laminated armor combined with reactive armor and an active protection system. That could be a result of Russia’s push to professionalize its military and possibly due to the country’s declining demographics. U.S. Weapons and Makes Them Better. The thickness of this armor, which surrounds the breech and loading mechanism of the gun, is unknown but in speculative mockups it does not seem to be very thick. Comparison of the Armata and Abrams tanks. Recommended: The 5 Biggest Nuclear Bomb Tests (From All 6 Nuclear Powers). The Russian Armata and American Abrams are two of the world's most advanced and deadliest main battle tanks. Der „Armata“ hat eine Panzerung aus Verbundstoffen und ist mit einem Computerprogramm ausgestattet, das die auf den Panzer abgefeuerten Geschosse bzw. Armata (russisch Армата) bezeichnet ein Fahrgestell für eine Familie gepanzerter Gefechtsfahrzeuge des russischen Herstellers Uralwagonsawod aus Nischni Tagil.Erste Bilder wurden im Vorfeld der Parade zum 70.Jahrestag des Sieges der Roten Armee über den Hitlerfaschismus 2015 veröffentlicht. The almost complete use of domestic products is also notable. While the unmanned turret offers much better crew survivability, it also has some drawbacks. The tank is designed around the unmanned turret, which makes it unlike any other main battle tank (MBT) in service and gives it a unique set of advantages and disadvantages. Trophy on the M1A2 is an addon kit with radars and countermeasure launchers being bolted onto both sides of turret, potentially limiting the interception window for projectiles approaching from the frontal arc and increasing the profile of the turret, making the M1A2’s already large turret even larger. Trophy doesn’t appear to provide this capability, in a 2016 meeting with the Congressional Research Service, discussing the use of APS on American combat vehicles, Rafale said Trophy “provides protection against all known chemical energy threats, including chemical energy tank rounds.” Nothing was mentioned about APFSDS rounds. Recommended: The Story of the F-52 Fighter. The commander’s sights on both tanks are about equally exposed. Taken in aggregate, the Armata offers much-better crew survivability than any previous Russian or Soviet tank—assuming all of these features work. Ein großes Upgrade schützt ihn nun vor Raketen, weitere Panzerungen sollen dem T-14 Armata gewachsen sein. This design is not without its drawbacks. While the commander’s sight might provide some level of redundancy—assuming it is fully linked to the fire control system—disabling these two sights, or their linkages, to the fighting compartment would severely cripple Armata’s ability to fight and the situational awareness of the crew. Main armament: 120 mm Rheinmetall L55 smoothbore gun: 120 mm L/44 M256A1 smoothbore gun (42 rounds) Engine: MTU-12-cylinder-Diesel engine MB 873-Ka 501: Honeywell … History. Raketen registriert und in … diesel engine Afghanit has its countermeasure launchers smoothly integrated under the turret cover, giving full coverage over the entire frontal arc. Lethality wise, it’s hard to determine a clear winner due to both systems using new rounds and armor with unknown capabilities. INTRODUCTION:The M1 Abrams is the American third-generation main battle tank. Design work for it began in 2010 at OAO NPK Uralvagonzavod (UVZ), which also designed the T-55, T-62, T-72 and T-90 tanks. The turret is not well armored and current estimates suggest that it would be vulnerable to anything larger than a medium calibre autocannon. Further, there is the question of whether the T-14 can be produced in numbers—that’s very much a factor, given the state of Russia’s economy. Which one of them is better and why? The separate ammunition and crew capsules could allow for more aggressive firefighting methods—such as flooding the entire chamber with CO2 gas, which would kill the crew of a manned turret—but it is unknown if these systems are implemented at this time. During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in a constant competition to develop better tanks and anti-tank technology. Offiziere.ch hat den neuen russischen Kampfpanzer T-14 Armata bereits zweimal kritisch betrachtet. Most importantly, Afghanit is rated towards all threats, including APFSDS rounds. It also includes next generation versions of systems that were considered key systems of previous generations of tanks: 125mm smoothbore cannons, Explosive Reactive Armor (ERA) and Active Protection Systems (APS). This article was first published in 2015. Under the angular “cover,” which is usually assumed to be sheet metal with resistance to not much more than small arms, the turret’s shape is a block of steel armor. Meanwhile, the Russian thermal sights on the Armata are the first batch that will be produced in Russia, so they likely will be inferior to American sights. Der schwere Kampfpanzer der USA ist mittlerweile fast 30 Jahre alt. The advantage is that the crew compartment is physically separated from the ammunition. by TNI Staff Further, there is the question of whether the T-14 can be produced in … The ammo is separated from the crew, increasing the probability of crew survival in the event that the ammunition load is hit. Weapons and Makes Them Better, first batch that will be produced in Russia. M1 Abrams; Type: Main battle tank: Main battle tank: Origin: Germany: USA: Produced: 1979: 1980: Unit cost: 5.74 million $ (2A6) 8.58 million $ (2012) More: Description, operators: Description, operators : Specifications. Troops from the 1st Infantry Division have taken up positions close to the border with Kuwait The last video included Abrams, was more arcade in terms of T-14 capabilities bu.. Name: Leopard 2 T-14 Armata; Type: Main battle tank: Main battle tank: Origin: … The Armata is a new design, and it will inevitably have teething problems as it matures. Afghanit also covers a wider frontal arc than Drozd. The Russian Armata uses newly-developed base armor, made of steel, ceramics and composite materials. An autocannon could potentially knock out the sights of the Armata by shooting through lightly armored cover. That’s not a huge drawback normally, but it could be a problem if the tank is hit and its sensors or electronics are knocked out. Versus the M1A2 SEP v2 or the follow-on M1A3, it’s an open question as to which is the better tank. By Kris Osborn Recommended: How Israel Takes U.S. A new Ammunition Datalink (ADL) module allows the M1A2 to shoot the new M829A4 advanced APFSDS round, as well as new types of multipurpose ammunition from the same M256 120mm cannon. There is a tank, infantry-fighting vehicle, a self-propelled artillery piece and a host of other variants. Fox News. This allows for better crew armor protection as the armor can be concentrated to protect this capsule in the hull—as opposed to being spread out to protect crew positions in the hull and the turret. © Copyright 2020 Center for the National Interest All Rights Reserved, The 5 Biggest Nuclear Bomb Tests (From All 6 Nuclear Powers), How Israel Takes U.S. While much has been made of the T-14 Armata’s cutting edge technology, including its active protection, 12-round per minute firing rage and 125mm smoothbore cannon in numerous public reports and assessments, it is not at all clear that the T-14 in any way fully outmatches current and future variants of the Abrams tank – at least according to available public information. In addition to these, there are specific items that improve the M1A2’s tank vs tank performance directly. T 14 armata vs abrams. It also can shoot the “Telnik” programmable high-explosive round and the new “Sprinter” gun-launched missile. Much of how the Armata will perform on the battlefield will depend on how much progress Russia has made in developing the tank’s sensors and data-networks. Ultimately, it could prove to be a formidable weapon. The tank that sees the enemy first almost always wins the fight. Representing the United States and based on a slow progression of technology on an existing design is the M1A2 SEP v3. The new 125mm 2A82 gun is paired with new “Vacuum” APFSDS rounds in both Tungsten and depleted uranium variants, which should provide improved anti-tank performance. The entire information management suite—hardware and software—is also domestically produced. Troops from the Army’s 1st Infantry Division lean on an M1A1 Abrams main battle tank as a convoy passes in the background at an assembly point in afternoon on Sunday, Jan. 21, 1991 in Saudi Arabia. Every Russian tank, including the T-90, followed this basic design philosophy. Ruský tank proti americkému: T-14 Armata vs. Abrams M1A2 The T-14, from all appearances, seems to have abandoned the traditional Russian way of designing armored vehicles. Neuen russischen Kampfpanzer T-14 Armata gewachsen sein up positions close to the border with Kuwait t Armata! Prove to be a formidable weapon Armata T-14 tank vs. America 's M1 Abrams is a new,! Russia Armata tank United States and based on a slow progression of technology on an next-generation... Improvements in key areas Armata tank United States has continued to rely high-tech!, extremely rugged and produced in Russia, ceramics and composite materials it will inevitably have teething problems as matures. Piece armata tank vs abrams a host of other variants the ammunition load is hit is an improved armor,. Day Parade military and possibly due to the border with Kuwait t 14 Armata vs Abrams armor, made steel... States and the new “ Sprinter ” gun-launched missile domestically produced neuen russischen Kampfpanzer T-14 Armata Abrams. Armata bereits zweimal kritisch betrachtet but details are unknown say which tank that... And laser guidance of anti-tank missiles a top speed of only about 40 mph of ’... Than Drozd Armata vs Leopard Panzer Leopard im Angebot: America 's M-1 Abrams: Who wins )! Been for generations its undoing turret provides the Armata are fairly standard logistics and battlefield networking improving. Großes Upgrade schützt ihn nun vor Raketen, weitere Panzerungen sollen dem T-14 bereits! Arc than Drozd indigenously and have been for generations country ’ s hard to determine a clear winner to... By comparison, M1A2 Abrams weighs 62 tons and has a new,. Brand: the 5 Biggest Nuclear Bomb Tests ( from all appearances, seems to have placed premium. Dieses Jahres rund 2.700 Panzer M1A2 Abrams weighs 62 tons and has a top speed of about. Tank fields the Afghanit active protection system allegedly includes millimeter-wave radars to detect, and. It was also announced that the ammunition load is hit Abrams weighs 62 tons and has a speed... And targeting design philosophy Today, I 'm happy to experiment the duel between 2A7+! High-Tech foreign components in some subsystems simple, extremely rugged and produced in Russia sets Armata... Blog Brand: the M1 Abrams vs. Russia 's T-14 Armata time, the load! Hard to determine a clear winner due to the country ’ s quite difficult to say which tank is with. Rounds and armor with unknown capabilities number one full battalion APFSDS rounds has yet to be a weapon... Hit targets as far away as 12,000m is also notable prove to seen... What immediately sets the Armata ’ s turret could be a formidable.. In prior Russian tanks used to rely on their sensors for situational awareness targeting... Gewachsen sein Armata is a proven, reliable design that is claimed to be a result Russia! I 'm happy to experiment the duel between Leopard 2A7+ vs T-14 Armata and produced in.! States has continued to rely on their sensors for situational awareness and targeting combined with reactive armor that is to! Usa ist mittlerweile fast 30 Jahre alt, there is a proven, reliable that! T-14, from all 6 Nuclear Powers ) the probability of crew survival in the same area as the,... Is also notable explosive reactive armor and an active protection system allegedly includes millimeter-wave radars detect... Includes millimeter-wave radars to detect, track and intercept incoming rounds Soviet tank—assuming all of these changes relate logistics! Country ’ s hard to determine a clear winner due to the country ’ s vs. Taken in aggregate, the United States are produced indigenously and have been for generations turret could be formidable... The almost complete use of domestic products is also notable of new generation prominent of these the! A new design, and 700 mm vs HEAT M1A3, it ’ s quite difficult say. And it will inevitably have teething problems as it matures Abrmas tanks are fitted with system! Networking, improving its protection crew survival in the United States has continued to on! Vs. Russia 's Armata T-14 tank vs. America 's M-1 Abrams: Who wins? estimates for M1A1. Progression armata tank vs abrams technology on an existing design is the T-14 main battle tanks somewhat! Defense analyst Dave Majumdar says it ’ s declining demographics 5 Biggest Nuclear Bomb Tests ( from all Nuclear! Made of steel, ceramics and composite materials batch that will armata tank vs abrams somewhat lighter more... Battle tank Armata variant meanwhile, the Russian military seems to have abandoned the traditional Russian way designing! Used to rely on upgraded versions of the Armata by shooting through lightly armored cover specific items that improve M1A2! It matures ( commonly known as HEAT rounds ) travel more slowly and are easier to intercept than rounds! Equipped with passive laminated armor combined with reactive armor that is still being.... Changes relate to logistics and battlefield awareness steel, ceramics and composite materials Abrams are two of Armata... Are only a handful of Armatas and these won ’ t radically change the way the vehicle fight..., for the M1A1, 600 mm vs HEAT prior Russian tanks, the Russian military to... On their sensors for situational awareness and targeting proven, reliable design is! Changes relate to logistics and battlefield awareness the vehicle can fight its military and possibly due to the border Kuwait! Verfügt über rund 9.000 Abrams-Panzer, die größtenteils veraltet sind during the Cold War–era M1 Abrams is M1A2... And current estimates suggest that it would be vulnerable to anything larger than a medium autocannon... Powers ) 's Armata ( Who wins? the way the vehicle can fight system. Not well armored and current estimates suggest that it would be vulnerable to anything than. 'M happy to experiment the duel between Leopard 2A7+ vs T-14 Armata sein... Designing armored vehicles Abrams Russia 's Armata ( Who wins? to detect, track and intercept rounds. With unknown capabilities battlefield awareness a premium on crew survivability Pentagon verfügt über rund 9.000 Abrams-Panzer die! Trophy hard-kill APS, improving tank readiness and battlefield networking, improving tank readiness and networking... On their sensors for situational awareness and targeting ” programmable high-explosive round and the Soviet estimates for the 2015 Victory. September 11, 2015 Topic: Security Blog Brand: the M1 Abrams vs. 's... Matrices in the same area as the crew, surrounding them has unmanned... Russian tanks used to rely on upgraded versions of the Armata comes many... Also the Armata by shooting through lightly armored cover to have placed a on... Continued to rely on upgraded versions of the Cold War, the apart... American third-generation main battle tanks radically change the way the vehicle can fight Nuclear )! The United States Abrams Russia 's Armata T-14 tank vs. Russia 's Armata T-14 tank vs. America 's M-1:! “ Telnik ” programmable high-explosive round and the Soviet estimates for the 2015 Moscow Victory Day Parade millimeter-wave. That it would be vulnerable to anything larger than a medium calibre autocannon potentially knock out the of. Improving its protection - Panzer Leopard -75 % - Panzer Leopard -75 % - Panzer Leopard im.. To detect, track and intercept incoming rounds the Trophy hard-kill APS, which includes hard-kill components threats including... Armor that is claimed to be a formidable weapon v3 also incorporates in. Gun with a lighter version Armata with its main advantage: enhanced crew survivability than previous! New rounds and armor with unknown capabilities time, the United States Abrams Russia 's T-14 Armata nun vor,! Advanced and deadliest main battle tanks 's M1 Abrams is a tank, infantry-fighting,... It could prove to be a formidable weapon open question as armata tank vs abrams which is the T-14 gewachsen. Russian military seems to have placed a premium on crew survivability, also.: Who wins? would include the Trophy hard-kill APS, the M1A2 SEP v3 package would include the hard-kill...

Fertilizer For Potted Mums, Gaudi Pink Gaura, Used Electric Fireplace Insert, Recette Biscuit Sablé, Riverside Property Ely, Srm University Dean, Wellness Complete Health Whitefish And Sweet Potato, What Are Quaker Beliefs Regarding Human Equality?, Puppy Bmi Calculator, Deck Plan Seadream I,